To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: 8270Hz |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:30:43 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1388755844; bh=GSF/L8whcWvr3beOreF5Jjidcy/BQdNNQTwx67hxgak=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=32GgsfWFdcpD27cUN5hFKGWNEYBNVuEz/nbP+TdY5ZGC5tSAXg+G4N9NNi1jMOJTp D/3CNRF3/148GR40UQ+dhD67W5auw+JmARZSsIyMt4XEH+LSjMEydc4hFKKbVGtK2z LFZHKkwkt051AZP6KQiJlQ9Rh/wTcTsJ3AVvk8pw= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
OK. OK. dreamers, the TX is on the air since 1309UTC.
QRG: 8270.000Hz. WX: continuous rain but not so strong. when ever the order comes, I can switch to Op-4H. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 03.01.2014 13:21 An: [email protected] Kopie: [email protected] Betreff: Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz Paul Nicholson put forth the important argument
that we'd better stay away from 8280 because it's a multiple of 60
Hz. Mains harmonics tend to drift a bit with the line frequeny so further
away is better.
Thus I retract my preposition, and suggest instead
to stay with the original 8270 Hz.
Uwe, go ahead!
Best 73,
Markus
PS Direct harmonics from 16.67 Hz are relatively
weak here, even though the railway is only 400 m away. It looks
more like carriers from switchmode power conversion units
(eg near 8 kHz), accompanied by the telltale 33 Hz spaced sidebands.
Unfortunately these frequencies are not easily predictable.
8970 is well placed with respect to harmonics of both 50 and 60Hz. 8270/8275 not so good in a 60Hz region. 8124 to 8126 would be a good range, considering harmonics of 16.67Hz, 50Hz, and 60Hz. Let me know what is decided, I will switch my spectrogram over to the new band. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: 8970 > 8270 Hz - please confirm, Aeritel_com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |