To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: OPERA overload? |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:01:51 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <009001cefdb9$49aa7cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
References: | <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>,<A99644D9D1684025BE96C4ECBEB46741@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <009001cefdb9$49aa7cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Jay,Yes yes, i know. Question is what ++ means :-) But it wasn't a complaint to you, Jay. We have DCF 39 here, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DCF39%20in%20488%20mHz.png ... That is already 10 dB attenuated by the LF band filter. 73, Stefan Am 20.12.2013 20:25, schrieb [email protected]: StefanOverloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW?Try a measured 30+ + dB above the noise in 3.2 kHz BW ... that's the way it is here. If you haven't experienced that get out a signal generator, key it, and inject it into your receiver along with the weak signals in OP or WSPR. Let me know how you make out.Jay |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: OPERA overload?, Bob Raide |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: OPERA overload?, Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: OPERA overload?, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: OPERA overload?, jrusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |