Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: 600m or 630m ?

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: 600m or 630m ?
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:11:17 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHO+qNcmdG1/e2InEOVSjDmLqgh6Q==
Thread-topic: 600m or 630m ?

Hi Stefan,

 

the 40 meter band is from 7.0MHz (= 42.86m) to 7.2 (= 41.67m). The 'error' is 7,2% at the lower band end and 4.2% at the upper band end.

For 20m it is about the same: the band is 14.00-14.35MHz while 20m = 15MHz.

In fact, on HF there are only 2 bands where the wavelength is is named after is within the band (160m and 80m).

 

If we call 472-479kHz (= 635,6m - 626.3m) the 600m band the 'error' is 5.9% at the lower band end and 4.4% at the upper band end.

 

So for me there is no problem in going for a round number, as we do for most other bands.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

 


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Stefan Schäfer [[email protected]]
Verzonden: maandag 16 december 2013 21:41
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: Monitor: 50SM77 Loc KO85SP Frequency: 0.477 MHz (600m)

G..

> Frequency: 0.477 MHz (600m)

Lambda = c / f = (299792458*m/s) / (477000*1/s) = 628.496m ~ 630m.

:-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>