Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: remote antenna tuning

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: remote antenna tuning
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:58:41 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC908D5@ICTS-S-MBX2.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC908D5@ICTS-S-MBX2.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Rik,

Thanks for sharing your experiences.
I also didnt expect that this effect is so noticable.
What do you plan to do now?
I am using a current transformer at the cold end of the loading coil and have a small analog meter to show the current (peak). And my antenna even needs a re-tuning when QSYing from CW to WSPR...
How do you match the coil to the cable? Directly, a tap or a ferrite transformer?

Am 08.11.2013 14:03, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

 By the way: remote tuning can be done correctly by tuning for best SWR instead of highest RF current at the TX output.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


I think the best is to accurately match the feedpoint impedance (at resonance Z=R+j0) of the antenna to 50 Ohm, by using a ferrite transformer. Then the variometer position of best SWR is the best working point for the PA (and the LPF). Highest RF current at TX output can quickly destroy the PA, especially class-E types :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>