Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: MF propagation

To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: RE: LF: MF propagation
From: Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:43:18 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Delivered-to: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <52823893.7000902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <ojm4wh1au5orhc5x6ylpj0lu.1384186716632@email.android.com> <52817DCA.1050205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<52823893.7000902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Stefan, et all...
4000 meters was dead last night so I tried 630.  Strange that only one decode on the Continent [France].  All the other decodes were UK stations even though many Euro stations monitoring.  Also, no West Coast but just shy of West Coast-strong signals to mid-west and close in-strange selective propagation, indeed-Bob, WE2XGR/6 [WSPR 2-474.2 dial]
 
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:17:55 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: MF propagation
>
> MF,
>
> I just see that there was a lot of TA DX last night, however local
> signals in a range of 300 km were very poor! Could it have to do with
> the elevation angle of the radiated signal, so that a flat angle results
> in less attenuation? Less number of hops, that's clear but maybe not
> only that..
> DST levels were in the range of -40...-50 nT but that seems not to be
> problematic for 630m.
>
> Does someone know more?
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>