Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 (2 of 2)

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 (2 of 2)
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:39:57 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Mike;
Congrats on your continuing great captures! 
The stations are;
WG2XRS/1, Warren Zeigler-not yet active on TX-K2ORS MA
WG2XRS/2, Jay W1VD-not yet active on TX-but has excellent RX
WG2XRS/3, John Andrews-active RX and TX-W1TAG MA
WG2XRS/4, Me-W2ZM-WNY
WG2XRS/5, Dex-W4DEX in NC-active RX and TX-found most nights one Hz below me-[74.5485]
 
I am using what Jay told me last season on 137 was 1 W ERP.  Jay and I have similar ants-90' verticals top loaded with chicken wire 250' long ground screens.  At 600 W on 137 he calculated about 1 W ERP for us.  I am running twice that on 73 so figured 1 W ERP.  Maybe it is not that much?Bob

 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:45:09 +0100
> Subject: Re: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 (2 of 2)
>
> More caps from last night.
>
> By the way, it would be interesting to know the relative ERPs of the
> experimental stations (how does Bob manage 1W ERP on 74k? Most
> Europeans can't achieve that on 136kHz), as well as a full list of
> amateur calls vs XRS suffixes.
>
> Mike, G3XDV
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>