Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz
From: "Hans-Albrecht Haffa" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:28:15 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <006f01ceb375$64738180$2d5a8480$@de>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<CAMFjj72XkssaQeaub8a5FyCF5cecbZ6VCDcSUPYLDcuGPn+nnw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <006f01ceb375$64738180$2d5a8480$@de>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sensitivity: Normal
 
Dear Marco,
having a look on the specifications I noticed, that the receiver seems to have a wideband ssb-xtal filter in the receiver path. For all of us of interest: Is the X1M a stable VFO to be used as a LW-MW driver or has it too a rx with good sensitivity and bandwidth for aural cw.  My rx for LW and MW: EKD 300 with 100 Hz mechanical filter on the last IF (200 kHz), followed by a audio-cw-Filter (b=100 Hz/ -20 dB).
 
55, Hans-Albrecht
DK 8 ND
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2013 um 09:13 Uhr
Von: Marco <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: AW: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz

Hello Warren,

Not a technical precise answer, but i did last night a quick WSPR test and the X1m 2min. transmission looked stabile on my primary receiver (see attached snapshot).

In addition i received WSPR on 474.2KHz with the X1m and my FT-857 in parallel both on Miniwhip antenna without any preamp. The FT-857 received abt. 3dB better. For exampIe I didn’t had a decode with the X1M when the FT-857 shows a station with -30dB. However not so bad the result for this small box. Will try it in the next days on 137KHz with a preamp and the miniwhip antenna on both receivers.

 

vy73

Marco, DD7PC

 

Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Lubos OK2BVG
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2013 18:47
An: _RSGB_LF
Betreff: RE: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz

 

Hello Marco and Warren!

I didn´t  test the stability, but there is written in the manual: "The stability 0,5 ppm" 

Yes, I think the same, X1M might be useful for LF and MW activities. I don´t expect, it will be better than my "big receivers", but it is really interesting.

 

Lubos, OK2BVG 


Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:47:03 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz

Marco, Lubos,

     Is the frequency stability good enough for QRSS or WSPR?

 

73 Warren

 

 

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Lubos OK2BVG <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Marco!

By coincidence - I received the X1M two weeks ago :-)

I haven´t tested transmitter. But  the receiver is not bad, indeed (...with an external input filter ,  of course).

 

Lubos, OK2BVG

 

****************************************

 

 

> From: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:36:10 +0200


> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz
>

> Hello,
> Received on the weekend the Chinese X1M HF-Transceiver. This Rig can transmit from abt. 0.1 - 30MHz, but has only bandpass filters on 80,40,29,15 and 10m band. So i tried 475kHz with a external bandpass filter and i got 5W in USB or CW (Not tried it, but this should work as well on 137KHz). In combination with a bigger PA a relativ easy way to transmit on the low bands.
>
> vy73
> Marco, DD7PC


 

 

--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1

 

E-Mail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virendatenbank: 3222/6671 - Ausgabedatum: 16.09.2013

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>