LF: JT9 frequencies?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: JT9 frequencies?
From:	"Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:48:38 +0200
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected]
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1379454524; bh=2gDd6tDMqZ9vCxN4EGSS79j9q/43ceGSL3pzKQCZh8A=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x1tZ3zZRoS20XQJksJf+ZPKd+Do5lhf4RN6IkrcNl1l9yqmJPBoQqOS97bE4kgQxv W2YEyKL1HZbNi3eU1WLciYmk2VtTwOrM3pG1Maq2vIf5/VkQMWfw5giqVD8xlmfJcz 0n4dKTfNgzXVVVXRdkwFDHscmhWzXwRNZCdOpnto=
Importance:	Normal
References:	<A71D3570DECC4896A900592BC078E247@White> <E5ABC04A83EF4655AC37A1CCD408F66A@White>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

From: Markus Vester

Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:43 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, SV3DVO?

> ...Normally JT9 should be sent around 137.13 kHz, ie. 136.0 kHz "dial" plus around 1130 Hz audio...

Hmm, thinking again, this statement was probably not correct. Actually I'm not sure if there's anything like a recommended JT9 frequency range on LF at all. Many of the earlier JT9 experiments took place in the lower WSPR-2 band around 137.43 kHz.

Best 73,

Markus (DF6NM)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, Markus Vester Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, SV3DVO?, Markus Vester LF: JT9 frequencies?, Markus Vester <=

Previous by Date:	RE: LF: Over the Pole and far far away, Laurence KL7 L
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Over the Pole and far far away, Laurence KL7 L
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, SV3DVO?, Markus Vester
Next by Thread:	LF: SV3DVO de F4DTL Op8, F4DTL
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]