Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: R: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
From: pat <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:20:26 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1373455229; bh=huj4bwV9S2cKxl8FwYaP+aB23HrXrVZkAbHa1baZMEs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QXNQ0ZYGWApdoO3F+4WWyIjYDfAa65ZDbyngnmojNSWtIwRicDFXhTz3UrmqEXefj UusATHSOZ/Oyu4fWOeQkaVSyor/b/sLzKmtvlJK+HZ/q51q5Aq9Elf207IlxYIX8bL KTLnLG3lldAOhXT2dyGy9LkF57OsuwCvpegTPhb0=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: G4GVW
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
Hi Marco,

One might argue that anything may be made to radiate if fed with enough power. The nature of the "field" so created then becomes the debating or debateable point!

Knowledge for its own sake is surely as valid as for any other reason! It is all philosophy!

73



On 10/07/13 11:57, [email protected] wrote:
Hornets cannot fly!
I find interesting and intriguing the discussion: understand how
things works is of course very important and leave to other to state if
this has to come before or after experimentation.
My first approach to MW was dictated from hirony.. how can such thing
work? After almost 2 years of use I still have doubts of interactions
between all the wire on my roof and the MW itself but finally is a gear
that makes some work. Under some circumstance better than standard wire
antennas, in other cases worse but today almost all my LF/MF receptions
are made with a MW.
The idea that the E probe is similar to a cap plate against the
universe can explain some aspects if not all.
What about the same idea applied to a TX antenna? (antennas should be
reversible items..)

73 de Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 10-lug-2013 11.51
A: <[email protected]>
Cc: "edgar"<[email protected]>
Ogg: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD&#39;s analysis of the MiniWhip antenna

I don't know if my previous posts arrived but I still prefer to think
that a "small" antenna is one plate of a capacitor and the rest of the
universe is the other. This then enables the spacecraft antenna to
work.
The universe is not a great big empty space!

73 de Pat



On 10/07/13 08:58, edgar wrote:
I sent this message two days ago and I did not see it arrive.

Although the subject is now out of context, I would like some
comment
on my question.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
Date:   Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:06:50 +1000
From:   edgar <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]



Hi Pieter-Tjerk,

If that is the case, and all the parts are at the same potential, how
does a space craft, radio controlled model aeroplane

get their signals?

Surely every conductor in the unit will have a difference in
potential
due to being in a electromagnetic field.

Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential will be extremely
small.
Surely it is only necessary to have a change of the Vgs voltage of
the FET.
So the geometry of the antenna has to be made to allow this to occur.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.







--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>