Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Proposed usage for the MF band

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Proposed usage for the MF band
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 15:07:29 +0200
In-reply-to: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FBCBDA1@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FBCBDA1@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello all,

Rik, thank you for forwarding these detailed news.

Thanks to all involved in the meeting. I must admit that i didn't expect such a result. The opinions of the various parties appear mostly wise to me.

The only misunderstanding thing for me is "ZRS asked if the CW DX frequency could be moved a little higher up the band."  Which CW DX frequency? And what is DX on 630m? How many stations are able+active to do such a DX (must be 2 at least) and do they need a separate frequency slot?

Anyway, all in all i can see no negative regulations and it is good that someone stated the argument to the regulators that it is not really necessary to have a band plan.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 09.05.2013 10:36, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Dear all,

 

those active on 630m might be interested in the outcome of the discussion of paper C4_06 (Bandplan for the 630 m band proposed by NRRL) at the Committee C4 (HF Matters) Interim Meeting (20-21 April 2013, Vienna):

 

4.5 Paper C4_06 was presented by LA4LN
RSGB stated that they support the principle of a band plan, but that it is too early to have a formal plan until the usage is better known.
DARC stated that the usage of the band at the moment doesn’t really require a band plan.
DARC introduced a plan "proposed usage" (see Annex 1).
ZRS asked if the CW DX frequency could be moved a little higher up the band.
DARC noted that there are still 4 NDBs in the band. They also asked if the QRSS CW segment could be moved out of the CW part of the band as it is decoded as a digimode. DARC also said there is currently no need for a coordinated beacon segment as we can use the existing NDBs.
OeVSV said we should observe the band usage for a while before deciding on a fixed band plan and suggested that centres of activity could be used also.
UBA stated it is too early to propose a band plan.
It was agreed to show current plan as proposed usage and to review at the next general conference.
CRC stated that we should not show a plan as the current users would not appreciate being told how to use the band.
The meeting agreed to change the wording to a ‘proposed usage’ plan and that frequencies should be referred to as centre of activities.
DARC introduced a plan "proposed usage".

 

 

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>