Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: RTTY tonight.

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY tonight.
From: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:38:32 +0000
In-reply-to: <60307476B965438A911887A1D8338951@GaryAsus>
References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <[email protected]> <0C37897B99BA4C249263E02AA5ED9DF1@GaryAsus> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8BB188A36149420181C1309CCE574E10@GaryAsus> <[email protected]> <E047837582734403B434C1C0F2391A16@GaryAsus> <[email protected]> <60307476B965438A911887A1D8338951@GaryAsus>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
On 03/03/2013 20:14, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Eddie,
 
Yes the interference is dreadful.
I did try after the severe stuff had gone.
 
RTTY will need to be a great deal stronger than WSPR for a decode.
Well  that is a broad statement.
WSPR is often good clean steady and visible which may well produce results, I have seen my WSPR good clean and steady on your Grabber.
I measured G6AVK's steady signal the other day, he was -11dB reported on WSPR, that signal was +20dB / Averaged Noise in a 2.5KHz bandwidth on SpecLab. One sounds unlikely for QSO modes, the other possible, like 100% copy on CMSK8 which we did. We shall have to try RTTY on that one.

G's Mind Games.

73 Eddie.

 
73, Gary.
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RTTY tonight.

Yes not a lot of hope of much getting through that mess.

I do see my WSPR on your Grabber and you were reporting -9dB yesterday.

Same QRP here as on WSPR, 10W of RF 5mW ERP from my small Marconi.

Eddie

On 03/03/2013 19:44, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Hi Eddie,
 
Sorry nothing seen from you, what are your Tx conditions ??
 
I do get a lot of intermittent RF type interference & is there at the moment.....see my grabber at :-
 
 
73, Gary - G4WGT.
 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>