Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 472kHz Bandplan or whatever

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz Bandplan or whatever
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:59:27 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s1024; t=1360609167; bh=dXx1uqjCIihGYsfOsm1K70e3t8fWYftvY/VZN0g29O4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XsagQvzwokzG/Agj1vx7ZZgXvih4wuVwxWFwxZGHJGC6jGBv7ZbifQ12lMu/5gWH/ExibSmyMTJ/uv6Qe2QL+z/Sm8PiQEYFm9xPxR3yQX30o4kgH+smXO5wDdU+GLfF3rXMmU0dWwlydXEY6d93NONIg3sYgipwj40zXDpPg/0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VxI0T/IgaQO89hqm85nXlw+/yNAO6I6ypjo+4m0BxAg7TFdu9hnCkUGeMvpgE0BTzdizQp+wYP1YaCnr/S40kCo26nT1UdtbpFd0LQGp8amyv80RUapfSJ6DkdD8Q8VXJ8ltdxu3wd+CalCSuU53kkSRuysxHCYzeLbDqeJeOb4=;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Roelof and group
Nature abhors a vacuum.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Roelof Bakker <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 13:54
Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz Bandplan or whatever

Hello Stefan,

> -Is 150 Hz BW useful for CW beacons? Imagine there are 3 CW beacons in 150 Hz to the same time. How does it sound when you have a 500 Hz CW filter?

Maybe this is mend to be an entry class level for NDB hunters, where it is not unusual to find more than 5 stations within 20 Hz. Or it is to encourage the use of really narrow CW filters!

This whole thread is an excellent demonstration of two classes of human nature: those who can't live without regulation of all details of live (even if they don't actually participate) and those who can!

Roelof, pa0rdt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>