Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan

from [M0FMT] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:34:06 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1360312446; bh=FkPUPlHkdC/p2W/+MoI09NkryVEKyYRNkrormtOh9ts=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DZiScxhhjOSKw7BK05/Rq24pEmnElkIfwDqiGpiECIakPbop0C6tMrjYMbhX+WUZRoouU4tXjjXl+P8L3glRyAr7jGWEYbYz7DR0V60SGACfmMJJf5dj4pXuRC099ATlXFD5H7p+/gw3jd8NKZLqdKqOk2GQaZgbzUTUNBPi538=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JeCI16oSJv0iXJrQmHPj7hg4ZOVEVg5xUN+6GmaA+1/F4IAywDFhDj8Zom8JuRte0QhXw7jZhlbdvze/z9Z+zYmOYLuA50XF5D5sskvDDvBtByJ3LDs24mb7jfeay+7kCqtHpQz2U3JrUZMNBEmB85YTbYuJ7Q0Zq7eg7x/vEBc=;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Bonkers!

 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 8:24
Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan

Are you aware of this proposal?
What do you think about it?
73 de Toni, HB9ASB


Recommendation
From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to present the
following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan:
472 - 479 kHz (630 m)
472 - 475 kHz  CW only – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz
    472.000 - 472.150  CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated)
    472.150 - 472.300  CW QRSS
    472.600                    CW DX Calling
    474.750                    CW Calling
475 - 479 kHz  CW + digimodes – maximum bandwidth 500 Hz
Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where radio
amateurs are secondary users.
Comment:
NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different digimodes. This
may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after considering
experiences.








[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan, traumwandler
Next by Date:  LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:  LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan, traumwandler
Next by Thread:  LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan, Chris
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]