From the gaps in the decodes , the flutter is
very deep , with a small mark to space ratio ? which
would tend to favour a summing 'averaging' decode
mode would give better results , 15 mins is
probably too long at range ?
G..
2013-02-27 03:46 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-25 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 03:50 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-24 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 03:54 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-24 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 03:56 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-22 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:04 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-28 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:08 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-26 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:12 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-24 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:20 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-22 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:24 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-17 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:28 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-22 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:30 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-20 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:32 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-21 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:36 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-18 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:38 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-23 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:44 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-19 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:48 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-18 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 04:54 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-18 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 05:02 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-17 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 05:06 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-20 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
2013-02-27 05:12 |
WE2XGR/6 |
0.475779 |
-18 |
0 |
FN12lq |
20 |
F59706 |
JN07th |
5937 |
56 |
--------------------------------------------------
From:
"g3zjo" <
[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 6:50
PM
To: <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF:
WE2XGR
> Hi G
>
> On 27/02/2013 17:08, Graham
wrote:
>> 2013-02-27 03:40
WE2XGR/6 0.475781
-7 0
>>
FN12lq 20 G8HUH
IO81mg 5457
53
>>
>> -7 dB , now that takes some beating
! ok for PSK31 as well !
>>
>>
Looks like wspr-2 Ed ?
> Yey. That is the one that
didn't get away. Very nice.
>
> Best DX was at the beginning of the
month.
>
> 2013-02-06 03:10
WE2XGR/6 0.475789
-24 0
>
FN12lq +43
19.953 DL-SWL
JO52hp 6243
3879
>
> When even I did it.
>
> 2013-02-06
04:44 WE2XGR/6
0.475789 -26
0 FN12lq
>
+43 19.953
G3ZJO IO92ng
5551 3449
>
>
Ed
>>
>> G..
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Roelof
Bakker" <
[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27,
2013 7:53 AM
>> To: <
[email protected]>
>>
Subject: LF: WE2XGR
>>
>>> Hello
all,
>>>
>>> Overnight, I found 21 decodes from WE2XGR/6
, ranging from S/N -30 to
>>> -22.
>>> The distance is
5675 km.
>>>
>>> 0454 -22 -2.0
0.475782 0 WE2XGR/6 43
>>>
>>> Best
regards,
>>> Roelof Bakker,
pa0rdt
>>>
>>
>>
>
>