To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Asymmetric Luxembourg Effect on HGA |
From: | Pieter-Tjerk de Boer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 6 Jan 2013 20:45:27 +0100 |
Cc: | [email protected], [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <71BE51CFEE0D4821BF900184D78D2582@Black> |
Mail-followup-to: | [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] |
References: | <71BE51CFEE0D4821BF900184D78D2582@Black> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 06:29:15PM +0100, Markus Vester wrote: > The same Czech programme is also transmitted from Topolná on 270 > kHz, so that one would more likely be the heater. Interestingly the > crossmodulation source is almost twice the frequency as the victim. Well > almost, but not exactly - so that I still can't think of a simple physical > mechanism to explain the asymmetry. If one modulates a carrier simultaneously in phase and amplitude (with the same audio signal), sidebands of the AM and the PM can (partially) cancel each other on one side of the carrier, while reinforcing each other on the other side. Thus, although one doesn't get a pure SSB signal, one could get asymmetry. Could this be the mechanism here; in other words, can ionospheric heating produce both and amplitude and phase modulation? 73, Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: YO2IS and others 476 Khz, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: DL2HRE, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Asymmetric Luxembourg Effect on HGA, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Asymmetric Luxembourg Effect on HGA, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |