Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Comparing earth-electrode v. Marconi antenna on 472kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Comparing earth-electrode v. Marconi antenna on 472kHz
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:16:40 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <CAHAQVWMxErTh_fbup5XrwLZRNqbjJPgKBVsVA4J+=1yqn+7eSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHAQVWMxErTh_fbup5XrwLZRNqbjJPgKBVsVA4J+=1yqn+7eSw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Roger
 
''directionality along the line of the earth-electrode baseline and a null off the sides''
 
A  terminated  travelling   wave 'thing'ey'   then !  sort of  makes  sense  , the  Amps  in the  top  section  are  maximised by  the  diffused  return  path  , may  be  not  cancelling  ?
 
73 -G..
 
 
 

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 9:06 PM
Subject: LF: Comparing earth-electrode v. Marconi antenna on 472kHz

This evening I've been noting my WSPR S/N reports from stations across the country and nearer Europe using my 9m long Marconi antenna (an average arrangement for a small garden plot like mine - but not the best) and comparing these with the reports last night when I was using just the 15m baseline earth-electrode "antenna". I crudely plotted the "improvement factor" in dB on a polar plot. Each dot represents a station reporting my signal with the dB improvement over the earth-electrode antenna plotted on a 0-20dB scale out from the centre. This is not good science, it is G3XBM science I'm afraid, but it give a fair idea of the difference and how direction affects this (see attached rough polar plot).

Although in some directions the difference is very little, in other directions the reports are up to 14dB better on the (omni-directional) Marconi.

My conclusion is that the earth electrode antenna is behaving somewhat like a loop with some directionality along the line of the earth-electrode baseline and a null off the sides. With stations receiving me off the sides there is most improvement with the Marconi, and less difference with stations end-on who were getting a reasonable signal with the earth-electrode antenna.

CONCLUSION: the simple, stealth, earth-electrode antenna is a VERY useful antenna on 472kHz as long as one is prepared to accept a 2-14dB loss compared with a "small garden" Marconi. In all honesty, I am getting better reports on the Marconi but few new stations are copying me: most could copy me on the earth electrode antenna.

I shall run WSPR overnight to see if any more distant stations copy me, then probably put away the 472kHz gear and Marconi for a while to find another interesting challenge - possibly something on 10m or VHF.

These last few days have been fun, and that is really what this hobby is about.

73s
Roger G3XBM
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>