Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ?
From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:09:35 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAFE05DC556D46CC9C5B2E737A24D711@AGB>
References: <F81F9B6A1D074332825E60C108EB14BB@AGB> <AAD464123E1B47319F2F3AA2490B65B5@White> <1D00CE16DCF340D7BE56065B76EF1A5F@AGB> <[email protected]> <CAFE05DC556D46CC9C5B2E737A24D711@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
Hi Graham,

Yes, in a sense DF0WD's transmission must have sounded like a beacon... callsign repeated multiple times, since after the initial call Fortunato had only copied the 'DF0' but not the rest; and I could only hope not to 'go down in QSB'. He was 579 here so his TX must be a bit stronger.

Your signal was between 449 and 569 here, similar QSB as Jan mentioned.

How about a "Farewell Fivehundred" party in the coming days ?

73,
  Wolf
Loc. JO42FD .

Am 23.12.2012 11:53, schrieb Graham:
Ok Wolf,
 
Ah , so  when is a  beacon not  a  beacon .?..  when its a  slow  cw  qso  !
 
I only looked  for short time  and  copied the  call   two  times 
 
Jan had  qsb on my  signal  , but  he was  ok  with  me , only   1  or 2   s points , but  500  seems to  have a distinct   time  X  distance  window at these  ranges , where signal's  peak  and  fall  away
 
73 -G..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>