Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: 136 JT9-10 T/A

from [jrusgrove] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: 136 JT9-10 T/A
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:36:05 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1354289767; bh=m+veKXWgThXOjkxFNW/7cxniKydtLxO7+JFNjzHtfJU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=F3ZartEc0C2hCswBhxM/Kka2/u/Pt0KOvh9ha3LIrx+8CDUuD8GBXC8ZS3R9Fldem 75rPj2/CiIXOKVgbm2Lc5ouYXl6dQCf6tq5d4z9CDUYbMAbOtP5hhti6oXYmQklES/ l+dGgtQ4KfJUGuO1pnR8uKwscw9iVwQYzE13rTqk2QGBlhtXr9OBlw0szQsROFSBe7 dLVHqekVASWNyjwACLcvYIgPGMYJ87OwRKXERpCaEZgDTWuKi1nLHlY8mBqNTDYMdz 9zAsqMBe+X9SJgoxNXpw0ZSIXWjtOElSBNmuHbiP7AvczHw9MO1s86JPUm7BGDkHl1 8IFn5gjkOD3Yg==
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <3BD64A7C261A4B98BA0FDA8D1B8ED955@White> <[email protected]> <BD27A68691E547F898ECB3820EAFE088@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <ABA93E7B4200426484554C464F173C0E@SV8CSHP> <[email protected]> <9F1A99AA5B9843E39732D8BBA787F399@SV8CSHP> <[email protected]> <D926D8A35C784744AD1AB5527B1517A4@SV8CSHP> <[email protected]> <001201cdce89$dd9c6cb0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan
 
Conditions were favorable with DST running -15 nT and static levels about 4 on a 10 scale (1 dead of winter, 10 middle of summer). Signals were in early,  dropped down for a few hours and then re-emerged ... which is normal for T/A signals this time of year. Six decodes. Did not run spectrogram. Congrats on 1st 136 kHz JT9 T/A!
 
UTC Date: 2012-Nov-29
 
2329   3  -34   0.0 1419.83   0   DK7FC JN49IK                 4 10
2339   2  -36   0.0 1419.83   0   DK7FC JN49IK                22 10
2349   3  -35   0.4 1419.82   0   DK7FC JN49IK                11 10
UTC Date: 2012-Nov-30

0229   2  -35   0.9 1419.87   0   DK7FC JN49IK                60 10

0249   1  -36   0.9 1419.87   0   DK7FC JN49IK                 7 10

0319   1  -36  -0.4 1419.88   0   DK7FC JN49IK                 5 10
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: LF: 136 JT9-10

Hello LF,

Thanks to DF6NM, RN3AGC, F5WK, DF2JP, UA0SNV, SV8CS, W1VD, LA5VNA (and those which i forgot to mention) for the JT9-10 reports on 137.42 kHz!!

I guess that was a first TA crossing in JT9 on LF. Jay, did you have local QRN or was it a quiet night? Did you try to watch the signal in a spectrogram? How many decodes did you get in the night? Or was it the only one? 23:30 is normally the time where the band opens between us these days, so i guess there have been a number of further decodes. Looking forward to that :-)

Would be gain 10*log(30/10) = 4.77 dB SNR when going from JT9-10 to JT9-30, assuming there is no negative effect due to QSB and so on? Would someone be interested in tests in JT9-30?

I guess this evening is reserved to MF CW here but late in the night i could run some JT9-30 sequences. MF alternatively.


There have been further decodes at UA0SNV (5760 km over land):
All that I received today.

1949   0  -38   2.2 1419.65  -1   DK7FC JN49IK
2009   3  -35   1.3 1419.62   0   DK7FC JN49IK
2019   2  -36   1.7 1419.56   0   DK7FC JN49IK
2149   5  -32   2.6 1419.65   1   DK7FC JN49IK
2159   3  -34   2.6 1419.65   1   DK7FC JN49IK
73 !! Vasily.

Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC




Am 30.11.2012 00:32, schrieb [email protected]:
Bingo

2329   3  -34   0.0 1419.83   0   DK7FC JN49IK

http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: 136 JT9-10, Graham
Next by Date:  LF: MF uploads does not seem to be working, Steinar Aanesland
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: 136 JT9-10, Graham
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 136 JT9-10, rn3agc
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]