To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:09:08 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8355E3A30B074B1F90A088E8DBFF9182@intelp4> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Thanks Terry, Am 30.10.2012 01:00, schrieb Terry GW0EZY: Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 It took over 2 minutes to decode (Win7-32 2.84 GHz 4-core) 73 GW0EZY Try to reduce the range from +-50 Hz to say +- 10 Hz. This will reduce the decode time a lot! Would be interesting what the difference is on your side. I will leave this transmission running over the night in case someone in the US or Canada or where ever wants to go on testing. Or should i switch to JT9-10 now? Somewhere there across the pond? 73, Stefan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: DK7FC JT9-5, Terry GW0EZY |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: G8HUH JT9-5, Terry GW0EZY |
Previous by Thread: | LF: DK7FC JT9-5, Terry GW0EZY |
Next by Thread: | LF: DF6NM Echo, Terry GW0EZY |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |