Stefan
I have an efficient antenna system for LF es MF and that does the trick. On
these low bands you need as much elevated wire as possible for reliable
results.
Unless a person is restricted for space the use of Micro probes, Ferrite
sticks, Match sticks, are a poor choice, Wire Loops as large as possible
would be a better compromise.
In my opinion Vertical antennas as high as possible are best for LF es MF
resonated for the frequency of interest. Use insulated radials preferably
elevated above ground or lying on the ground but not bare wire buried
The above applies to Receive as well as Transmit. Some active stations
although transmitting a good signal are having difficulty RECEIVING
properly.
and are normally in BROADCAST mode(BEACON MODE ) getting reports via
Internet.
I prefer QSO mode to get my report via Radio in real time.
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC OFF THE AIR ?
Yes Mal, sorry, the program didn't display your decodes on my PC. Don't
know why.
+3 dB is very remarkable for that distance.
Thanks for monitoring.
73, cul, Stefan
Am 06.09.2012 16:54, schrieb mal hamilton:
> Stefan
> I copied you on Opera around 2100 at +3 dB as reported via BS last nite
> de mal/g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Schäfer"<[email protected]>
> To:<[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:59 AM
> Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC OFF THE AIR ?
>
>
>
>> Hi G.., MF,
>>
>> Am 06.09.2012 01:15, schrieb Graham:
>>
>>> [...]have you any luck with some excel macros to plot maps
>>> etc ?
>>>
>> No, i'm no expert on this. Experts will tell you that you mustn't use
>> Excel but Origin instead or so :-)
>>
>> Here is a summary of the stations who received something on 477 kHz
>> yesterday, showing the best S/N obtained. Thanks again.
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>>
>
|
