To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re : LF: DK0SWF- what´s the problem |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2012 12:53:22 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1347209603; bh=A+E5CcjcYTuIXNejqM4JtygvNmjYFfeZM2iRd4AG4lE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fBKOD6XEBR1xAozdsUyT+kwlVyax9SHvnc0ipXj7D7UBJQiXTEGqVUKqSmyQBFWAx KW3WUpf/FiOR/0FitcQuYrjBslErCZY2VkT5DQfK5XIBsBk9UVjakqXSVcg1dIcitK pCDZBKvsH5yJn1MLKpHGbnsdqKT3Nunw+hU9s41M= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanx you for this beautifull MF activation. I like it.
F4DTL Nicolas
-----E-mail d'origine-----
De : Dr. Wolf Ostwald <[email protected]> A: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Envoyé le : Di, 9 Sep 2012 14:28 Sujet : LF: DK0SWF- what´s the problem hi ! Instead of looking at the installation from the experimenters view, i hear someone crying and whining. All things go thru evolution and of course the "know it alls" never make mistakes or are less than perfect ;-) . The ex-SWR site has lots of room and an receiving array surely can be next. The activating guys had to work hard to get access to the facility and one should give them time to proceed. They should be granted support instead words of criticism from an "rocking chair" position. I´d rather think twice before using the "whip" that`s my two pence worth de wolf df2py |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend, Clemens Paul |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DK0SWF- what´s the problem, Graham |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: DK0SWF- what´s the problem, Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |