To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:39:23 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <37060B46D79F4AC69EEDBDA79B6B00CC@AGB> |
References: | <06DDBDA2FE814440A956B5C33365FB75@AGB>, <003501cd8452$4ce82780$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <37060B46D79F4AC69EEDBDA79B6B00CC@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 27 Aug 2012 at 14:08, Graham wrote: > Interesting , is Op visible at -40 dB ? , Oh yes! I have done some tests with TF3HZ's grabber and I can see my Op32 on a QRSS screen when he was decoding at very low levels. However, there is not much in it and Opera is very impressive in resolving weak signals. For beacon and propagation tests Opera reports are so much more convenient than taking snapshots of images of a QRSS grabber screen. For a QSO, QRSS/DFCW may well be more useful, but the path conditions can be more easily determined using Opera. It is "horses for courses". Mike, G3XDV ========== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |