Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:11:46 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <06DDBDA2FE814440A956B5C33365FB75@AGB>, <003501cd8452$4ce82780$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <37060B46D79F4AC69EEDBDA79B6B00CC@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Yes  only  go's to  show  ,

One  Guy's  ''Pixel''  is  another's  ''Nibble''

- have to keep in mid, Op is a one-pass data mode , the decode over heads are significant compared to 'carrier detection' -

But as Stefan has commented , the number of stations active on 136 tx/rx is definitely on the increase, where as the PSK map used to show the odd red spot , now its quite packed !

G  :)

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 2:39 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes

On 27 Aug 2012 at 14:08, Graham wrote:

Interesting  , is   Op  visible    at  -40 dB ? ,

Oh yes! I have done some tests with TF3HZ's grabber and I can see my
Op32 on a QRSS screen when he was decoding at very low levels.
However, there is not much in it and Opera is very impressive in
resolving weak signals.

For beacon and propagation tests Opera reports are so much more
convenient than taking snapshots of images of a QRSS grabber screen.
For a QSO, QRSS/DFCW may well be more useful, but the path conditions
can be more easily determined using Opera. It is "horses for
courses".

Mike, G3XDV
==========



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>