Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

R: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: R: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Dear LF,

I'm really thinking about stop subscription to groups and 
enjoy ham radio on the air..

We have still a bit of freedom and we can 
meet the same people in more than a group!
If I have time to check on 2 
reflectors is fine but sure I hate to loose time to delete a huge 
amount of messages..

73 CU on air

Marco IK1HSS
----Messaggio 
originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 4-giu-2012 2.33 PM
A: 
"[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Ogg: Re: 
LF: Re: An &quot;LF-reflector&quot; Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

Dear Mal,

Who said anything about ME being a moderator of the LF 
group? Not me. 

Please, stop this personal and nasty hate campaign. 

73s
Roger
G3XBM



-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

On 4 Jun 2012, at 
13:17, "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reference 
postings from G3XBM
> I am concerned about items 9  and 10
> Messages 
can be VETTED and DIFFICULT members banned.
> Sounds like a POLICE 
state and what are the credentials of those VETTING and what is a 
DIFFICULT member probably someone who has a different opinion or point 
of view from his or even a sense of HUMOUR
> What ever happens avoid 
him as a moderator
>  
> de g3kev
>  
>  
> ----- Original Message 
-----
> From: Roger Lapthorn
> To: [email protected] ; Alan 
Melia ; Stefan Schäfer ; Markus Vester ; James Moritz 
> Sent: 
Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM
> Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo 
group instead .....PLEASE
> 
> With the latest outage (5 days already) 
may I again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group?
> 
> In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or 
problems with any group to which I belong or moderate.
> 
> Instead 
they have had these advantages:
> Messages can be read on the web if 
preferred (saves cluttered in-boxes)
> There is rarely a delay of more 
than a few minutes before messages are received.
> All messages are 
archived and searchable.
> Large files can be stored.
> Photos can be 
stored - 100Gigs worth.
> Links can be stored/shared
> Videos can be 
stored.
> Polls can be run.
> Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a 
number of moderators to speed up the process)
> Difficult members can 
be banned in exceptional circumstances.
> Spam messages can be filtered
> Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc)
> The 
advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot understand why 
the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this week it is 
surely time.
> 
> To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or 
whatever) would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all 
interested members here would take about a day at most. All you need is 
to agree a group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some 
basic group ground rules/FAQs.
> 
> Please, think about it again. 
> 
> 
73s
> Roger G3XBM
> 
> -- 
> http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> http:
//www.g3xbm.co.uk
> https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
> http:
//qss2.blogspot.com/
> 





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • R: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE, [email protected] <=