Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo |
| From: | pws <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:33:08 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <CAHAQVWMRAtp3uiCVqja7wjE6O+jox1q_NVF0NoZZQW=TXkeYiQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAHAQVWMRAtp3uiCVqja7wjE6O+jox1q_NVF0NoZZQW=TXkeYiQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
Roger, You wrote: Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent poll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to Yahoo, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either place or both. ... 1. After those boring incident at the VLF Group at Yahoo! (look for "Schumann Resonance and Venus Transit" there) I propose using Yahoo! for day-to-day postings and Blacksheep for in-depth discussions. 2. If you cannot live without those Yahoo! stuff use an incognito without any call sign or full name. Keep in mind that all postings there are fully open to the world including all kinds of search engines, data mining engines, etc. Ignoring that is naive. Peter, df3lp |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Ferrite broadband (LF-MF) antenna?, pws |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo, Graham |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo, Roger Lapthorn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |