To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: DCF39 from Tasmania |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 3 May 2012 12:34:58 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1336047009; bh=DFaZdzX8Uo9aTzXEfctjQgsrb1L2rCMnibD+phYqdBw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Y50pPIMG8QTWBBVH1voCP1+H5ESRfIKQjT4uKyyysuGkH13Gvlr4h7mgZw0ZH5DqUbghMSE8pD6sKVgitKYYwOSmDU8sl/pdkEJzuuB+1GhpTPr5R2+ls2KO34NYjNaSKNatPq5atnXbpRhgnY0iC12lB9quFC+t2R+LO/1r1Fg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Cv2Wt+Zvjbs8xRGgd2BBoOn0GkCK2GISZ08nYKP2iQ3rcr5oo3izE26P3xkPj4nYWYwPLorGkmacgVtwzHLf8K6CPsxKM2Fgm6LlSMFHwa+TsIHoNZaEvZ0GsIYiFSY4ac3IeMm++56ZsEy34eF8v156AP9LNXJzr0alo9iMA6Y= ; |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Bob great stuff!! that is a very interesting and useful plot you have. Well Done. One addition that is often added is a narrow band plot of the noise, just clear of the main signal. You do seem to have a very quiet location, so this may not be needed to identify local "miscreants" :-))...... see Scott Tilley's VE7TIL plots of DCF39. However in the long term it acts as a very usefull "calibration and confidence" facility confirming that your aerial sensitivity is still in the right area. One difficulty with long term propagation monitoring is ensuring that the receiving station's parameters have not changed. If you can do that, you are sensibly able to determine when the best strengths are achieved during the year, and the effects of both small and major geomagnetic distrubances. Without it you are always wondering whether the signal has been affected by local weather or an increase in the band noise, or even a coroded connection (been there, done that :-)) ) etc. The levels you are seeing suggest that western Europe to VK7 is well within possibility. It just needs the right conditions for long enough and maybe the right transmission mode. Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 8:10 AM Subject: LF: DCF39 from Tasmania > I am continuing to monitor DCF39 every day. > A graph of the received signal strength and a screen capture are > available on my web page at: > > http://www.users.on.net/~bobw/dcf39/ > > > Bob VK7ZL > > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: flex 3000, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Venezuela LF progress, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: DCF39 from Tasmania, Bob |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: DCF39 from Tasmania, Bob |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |