Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: test

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: test
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:16:57 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1335187023; bh=U1PBO/pUXS7EJv+vJSn+EE2Hr3CjXXgi6Tb89nFYko4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=NArUwauDIUiB5Bnj9794Qzi74k9X6y+DffnG8YCcVRr+4Fj0jwR3poRhJ55l4JIxTBg3ZG3fLec79Lgel/kS5kR0264Qg4YGs/9ZW2QNCuS5nfcm+XIRffOjAqPwJtv+q3F2Flxo7SHIVAvr7s0978HOgmLsWuVFrbwzBLzeci0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Vqx6sMjxWWfQ6XC6hpfK16PJC9ZEew74AEIGzuE2/MQfGUW+aQCyzwTSQBRHNXQqrJoK+2W4CdNRuy6L0ggys6b5EYN/CQHS+zDFdQQbnw/9haZ4ixLAnjd2Vpcd9PSiHWM87dPspH9m/ljbw/ZdNnvfhaUMh6c4hdwQYrHDcpc= ;
References: <EB771BBC5076443EA689F08CCC5A0448@AGB> <4813845C7E3B4B6487DB19F8C83086B9@GaryPC> <3E9AEF72E4944B18BB87D25133AFB187@AGB> <D3C4460DA6124F2BAA9865BFDC80074E@GaryPC> <1CCF221D62B742E5AA0705B005C8D88F@GaryPC> <9A96CF2EAC05426B8E4116CFA2AE060A@AGB> <42D1D9EB3CBC467B8E91D02E25CFAF5F@GaryPC> <85E67D8AF91641FEA69EBEA3D55E3BED@AGB> <[email protected]> <001e01cd2113$ad828600$1502a8c0@Clemens04>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Clemens, the following was in the header of the " test" message you sent
and may possibly  explain what happened. The Blacksheep server has been
updated recently and has caught out some ISPs who dont use some of the
processes or dont use them correctly.

Alan G3NYK

-------------------------clip
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
"relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  test For some reason my last two emails from yesterday
didn't
    get through. This has happened to me for the first time. 73 Clemens
DL4RAJ
    [...]
 Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- -----------------------------------------------
---
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider
                             (cpaul[at]gmx.net)
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db
Subject: LF: test
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [email protected]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120423-0, 23/04/2012), Inbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

test
------------------------------end clip
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: LF: test


> test
>
> For some reason my last two emails from yesterday didn't get through.
> This has happened to me for the first time.
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>