To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 8.970khz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:41:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1332272512; bh=B2M3UFcudILPxqXKEI/hcBmHLyCtSXUDAY//2I1oayc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lj7ZKc/JIh4JTDVe0+aYhN0vMIJPG2sRmC0eh98OX/+yoRyBOpdxuFl8KrLK9ghaK dV3VJqk4X5Z1eG9ngp4wDO2mSBCFYpTMS8keYHUpuwjDIsMfbNEMEWvWX6tIW2gwHi u+vj4g/04tumupXrOlex+rUClJ5Rdhje1SbcXfYw= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
... and some "hot pixels" on 8970 which probably belong to Henny.
There's also a conspicious narrow noise enhancement on 8970.016, but this seems to be a display interpolation artifact (something like 0.999 pixels per FFT-bin).
Best 73,
Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Di, 20 Mrz 2012 6:18 pm Betreff: Re: LF: 8.970khz Am 20.03.2012 18:48, schrieb Chris Dillon: Hi Uwe - here's a screenshot of your signal in IO92vf Cambridgeshire. ...it shows the last K of OK2BVG too :-) 73, Stefan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: LF: 8.970khz, uwe-jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.970khz, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.970khz, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 8.970khz, henny van elst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |