Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: OPERA QSO

from [qrss] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA QSO
From: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:59:24 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <002201cce18f$b4c42c70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
I think I am seeing OP16 in the wrong watering hole on 500kHz.

On 02/02/2012 10:34, qrss wrote:
Mal

Would you like to try OP16 on 500kHz, with our distance apart it should be a very viable test. I can push a button and send OP16 instead of 18 at any time.

73 Eddie

On 02/02/2012 09:47, mal hamilton wrote:
Graham
Opera seems popular,  are there any plans ahead for a basic QSO mode instead of Beacon only.
At present on MF/LF it has popularity in its favour over the other data modes.
Instead of FEC how about the amtor approach where the transmission triggers a RX stn who responds and a QSO begins. The exchange need only be a few key words.
How about modifying Amtor or Pactor for MF use.
mal/g3kev
 


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: OPERA QSO, qrss
Next by Date:  Re: LF: OPERA QSO, qrss
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: OPERA QSO, qrss
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: OPERA QSO, qrss
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]