To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: New Band 472kHz - 479kHz |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:04:22 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FsbgKI2gVDjJ7JD8DeGr2jBcfydrRMY4SzZZb5p0BsU=; b=woF+PsCI4M4AwD214acLS9fe77YjVq+EGZU6x3uZQ65W549P+W+gkNNvFbI9XJ0WCF LyvnVA9Lh7RlC9ZD/vgwdu9nDTkp3EveG5lPZaqEVq1BRwglDSz7DyRN20ayAzQND7nk GJ/A925EsU6qAefEvTBRYpRMxxTY6l/4HFRgY= |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23S-nYXeQqLr05Z5Bt5aBP71F90gF+mM4h96QEmmd3uTng@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <9207810492E540FFB1155BC3317C1835@IBM7FFA209F07C> <CAA8k23S-nYXeQqLr05Z5Bt5aBP71F90gF+mM4h96QEmmd3uTng@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sent too soon
2) Bandwidth compressed SSB, where parts of the sepctrum are frequnecy shifted to fill in the gaps.
3) .. or .. just wooly sounding hard filtered pure SSB
'jnt
On 15 February 2012 20:02, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: 1)Digital voice at 1200 B/s using a bandwidth efficient encoding - would still leave space for QRSS / WSPR |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: New Band 472kHz - 479kHz, Dave G3WCB. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: New Band 472kHz - 479kHz, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: New Band 472kHz - 479kHz, Warren Ziegler |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: New Band 472kHz - 479kHz, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |