To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: tonight |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:09:47 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <CABP+t7ZtkkvB9WLST+yPj7U2ZduU7EnJkzx8647pQDOXD0q8Hg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CABP+t7Z4b+nmWbOJzzicGtjKm7DwgdewLNhqDuB-L_r+gMJ=-Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CABP+t7ZtkkvB9WLST+yPj7U2ZduU7EnJkzx8647pQDOXD0q8Hg@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Am 02.02.2012 23:48, schrieb Douglas D. Williams: So, 136.172kHz....QRSS 30 second slow? I'll be watching.That gives me an entire 6Hz of bandwidth in my ARGO window, centered on 136.172kHz.D. KB4OER No, QRSS-60. I could also switch to DFCW-90 which may be a bit more efficient. Look at UA0SNV, propagation seems to be better than i expected :-) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/47550836/UA0SNV_LF_Grabber.html 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: A lentus mode update, Steinar Aanesland |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VX9MRC de F6CNI Op4 -22, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: tonight, Douglas D. Williams |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: tonight, Douglas D. Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |