To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Pan-European allocation at 500 kHz (was LF: Re: IQ2MI temp (hopefully) QRT) |
From: | M0FMT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:09:34 +0000 (GMT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1325509775; bh=whAKLQdhgGPDtz3vJw+ItaFPEEYfH78Kxy9X+tbRi0U=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a6t1t0XdQrhqSJ/I9/GMyZWrhbhyCib/ViqAxKJMzsRpkeGPc0iUWxzNorK4isZgXz85ZSKNhNBYr5CGe1pu3q9Rs9EM7niu6WIuuTWbNEgXepusJnE6qM4vv5M5Ui8mSqMo4UKa5gO4qpJ3VbgE2O082iDPvDeGRxYvKLOp6Fo= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XWIA/TzbllWKDpefktHuunfVM/hsbuj5drYRprcqnJt11+kywByFObqQNicJJHpQrkipbXKUny6thzowpAUbA7M6KnneXu6WG4/eLilpA3WcF0gvZd6TFRkv89EgmyPG4SokkWA7K1MkI5oLKsouJiSZdbQNdquwltFjwhIt6Ck=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <0db801ccc8ab$a46fe0a0$ed4fa1e0$@it> <001501ccc8b0$95430b20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi all
This a plea not to mess around with the Amateur licence any more. I for one do not know who I am working these days. The call signs are a mystery to me so I take all calls at face value.
500kcs has become a de facto amateur "watering hole" like 8kcs and it will now remain that while there is interest what ever the ITU (or the EU? I think that should read UN) write down on paper...... there is the "Official" world and there is the real world...... I am trying to live in the real world these days.
Happy new year to all what ever the call sign ("official" or otherwise) and what ever the frequency. Two way radio is the bond. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: John Rabson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, 2 January 2012, 10:29 Subject: Pan-European allocation at 500 kHz (was LF: Re: IQ2MI temp (hopefully) QRT) Mal,
First of all, according to the ITU regulations there is no Amateur Service allocation around 500kHz. Some administrations have issued permits to radio amateurs (and others) with various conditions.
Some of these permits do not permit two-way communication. I understand that the German authorities have issued such permits. As the possibility of an amateur service allocation around 500 is likely to be raised at the next World Radio Conference, it is unlikely that the Germans will at this point go any further than they already have.
I have no doubt (although I do not know) that the question of such an allocation has been raised with the French authorities, but for the same reason as for Germany I would not expect any developments until the next WRC proceedings have been ratified.
If we were to have a single radio prefix for all of the EU (by the way, the USA has several prefixes) there would need to be a central issuing authority, and frequency allocations across the EU would have to be harmonised. At present they are a long way from that. For example, 6 m in France has quite severe restrictions on power level and location, and we do not have all the microwave allocations some other countries do.
John F5VLF
On 1 Jan 2012, at 19:10CET, mal hamilton wrote:
Maybe there should only be one EU radio licence prefix for all EU in the Euro zone like the USA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Fw: OPERA Download link, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Fw: OPERA Download link, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Pan-European allocation at 500 kHz (was LF: Re: IQ2MI temp (hopefully) QRT), John Rabson |
Next by Thread: | LF: LF wishes, cesare.tagliabue |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |