Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Improving Earth Resistance

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Improving Earth Resistance
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:08:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hi John,

Am 03.01.2012 21:51, schrieb John Rabson:
The earth system consists of three wires radiating from the shack with angular 
spacings of about 60°. They run underground through plastic conduit for a 
distance of about 10 m and the remote ends are terminated in metal rods of the type 
used here to provide safety earth connections for mains installations.  The three 
wires are connected together at the transmitter to provide the earth.
That sounds not bad.
The local geology is a mixture of granite and limestone with intrusions of 
calcite.
Not optimal.
What about the house mains earth? Is it connected in parallel? I would do so. If you use the TX antenna as the RX antenna too, it may be an idea to disconnect the mains earth automatically by a relay to prevent local QRM coming in to much...

At present the resistance at 137 kHz at the feed point is about 150 ohms (plus 
of course some reactance which it is not difficult to cancel).
Are there many trees sourrounding the antenna? A phot would help us here.

  At a frequency of 980 Hz, I get a resistance of about 25 ohms, depending on 
whether there has been recent recent rain.
Where did you connect that frequency generator. One pole is the earth, but what is the other pole?
I think it is only useful to measure the losses at the desired frequency.

Reasoning that the much higher resistance at 137 kHz might result from the 
return current flowing through the ground rather than through the earth spikes, 
 I tried strapping the remote ends of the earth wires. The additional wire ran 
almost below and effectively parallel to the antenna wires.

This strapping made practically no difference to the 137 kHz resistance, so I 
had further thoughts:

1) laying down an earth mat or something like chicken netting, or the kind of 
metal mesh which is used for fencing.  Unfortunately, such things are expensive 
here (I estimate the cost would run into three figures in Euros), or

2) making the mat out of hookup wire or something similar. I have plenty of 
such wire. Would I need to join the wires at each crossing, and what spacing 
should I use?

Any suggestions, please?
Hmm, first i would switch the mains earth in parallel.
Then, if the goal is to optimise the antenna efficiency it appears to me it is rather useful to invest in a larger pole to increase the effective height of the antenna wire. There are 18m poles available, not to expensive. With 2 or 3 x 3 supports there should be no problem.
The metal rods you use are excellent!
Maybe make some experiments (on 137.0 kHz, with a resonated antenna), measuring the antenna current and power. First use 1 rod (exclusively), then 2, then 3. You will see if it is worth to spend another 3 rods or so.

Which antenna C do you have?

73, Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>