To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF |
From: | Warren Ziegler <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:14:02 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aJFhZR6kdp/a0Z7JjUmMiG5aEuB7LE0IJIYSEo2kNVk=; b=dvUh1B9rzFHYFiBD8pXJA99RwEhT79efqRS/HMYObAjwLqYrawEJNzwWg820269W8G VFwpDxL/GlpXXblbj1sLSVd2TUaqviicqfkp0f4AeFDck5lEB6KDpcRFcdWSFGjaEAKB l6uysb/DVY5PogRkOPth6YdIULju9O8h2qsyw= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71_XL=q1vjLYr5JjULdu58YdT3ij-mXV_OTXG7jeeeZkQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71Ooc3RdtiuERhsSt6LdaQVitn9RHxAGcQoMVYJ-G0c4w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Stefan, I just re-read your post, I gather you are asking about Litz wire as a loop conductor?
My friend Bill Ashlock tried using ex-Decca Litz wire as a loop and found that it was too fragile, individual strands broke and the wire became more lossy than conventional wire. I am considering using large diameter aluminum wire, the conductivity is of course not quite as good as copper but the skin depth is greater so that the net result is that Al is 33% more lossy than copper at LF frequencies but Al is only about 25% of the weight as Cu (also Al is about 25% of the cost of copper) so for the same weight of wire Al should be superior.
-- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 2011/12/4 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: xxSPAMxx Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Warren Ziegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: HGA22 plot in 5X, Alex K |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |