To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: VO1NA in daytime |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 3 Dec 2011 20:01:01 -0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1322942739; bh=CAyrll9zlS9SMM93A/hbMZU9RyXzK17WVxRm5z1Xy1c=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=cFdqmDc+9WEDKER7Aox9LuD7hVUgSAFaF5U+CELhlERCIylq8Ongin/c9/bwVzJzyLKAjZFbd1ANvyFGDipUM5WMoOiJWRm8p56JD2INEy+mSw3IJtrJa4DO2f3/gZJBhXxjVHssUL5eT66ZzlVtTM2Oy2zWWdURz9LmBEYppU0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=22UCLe7/F+UEdmpVlX8PN+2NC5zfR6Mxj0zRoj3kFJsIGkYGMth6ginb9pDfON4+7JjoScrfZNIRLLyXc9h4H9aM76p8xR1y2J2ZzjJoxgi2ytJjsCYg7ApcSEJUFZfo00NSJ+hXJhtt3NVISAxjt9wGrTvD/fqMvCHQ0UMaNXQ= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <3DF3C45C6C6349DBA60C6365D65905ED@Notebook> <FD1EA89C7D424F988DB7500EB069125B@JimPC> <3C337BC6A6FE44CEB4CDA3162C706660@JimPC> <61AE9E78CBB44FACB008F3DB480F0FA1@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Jim a low level geomagnetic event pushed the Dst index down a bit on the 30th and the 1st. At this time of year this could give a significant increase in the daytime ionisation in the D-region. I have seen very noticable effects on shorter daytime paths immediately after a major geomagnetic event, and I have seen some variations that seemed in time with Dst values on the path to Lakihegy HGA22. My other thought is that the daytime D-layer could be weaker at this time of year and not absorbing so strongly so the signals could reach the E-region. However it seems unlikely that the returning signal would be strong enough to detect. Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 4:03 PM Subject: LF: Re: VO1NA in daytime > Dear LF Group, > > I was away from home for the last few days, but left the 136k receiver > going. Generally, conditions have been rather noisy over the last week, > although signals around 137.78kHz have been visible from time to time from > XES, XKO, XGJ, XNS, VO1NA, RA3AGC, UA4WPF, "YS". I have not quite had a > repeat of the daytime reception of VO1NA seen a week ago, but traces of > Joe's signal were visible up to about 1100utc on 30th November and 1st > December - see attachment. Also visible in the attachment is AGC, even > though the whole path must have been in full daylight for a few hours. > > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Odd callsign on 500 kHz, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Odd callsign on 500 kHz, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VO1NA in daytime, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | LF: wpfxgj, victor13 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |