| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: 5 Whats? |
| From: | Dimitrios Tsifakis <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:16:09 +1100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fxtbNL8xxn+C2Or00FRWoSryLinpKZCkZB+FzFKGsB0=; b=PxajVQFY13icNrytHY1DT4Tv9uAeNQJCi/LLlcf/G4PQG76x0zdG+xvNfc71yzL5Yz YZNpAyqz5qWmXCOimrEc6BbymvS7TIsrGsSDIeJGUFOraJ0TFUcToZQQeShApi9lP6Aa ka7XwjM9qmPlzYpJys2kmbzyyYcBW3nm9om3E= |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
I can certainly live with that. Fingers crossed now for WRC-12. And a well done to those that achieved this outcome. I hear that it hasn't been an easy task. There is still plenty of things to do with 5 W radiated. Isn't this radio hobby of ours all about the challenge anyway? Smaller rigs, less global warming :-) Also, bigger wavelength, isn't that better? :-) Seriously, better this than nothing. New crystals can be cut, and the antennas can be tuned. 8 kHz is plenty too. Sometimes, at least in this part of the world, I even think that 2.1 kHz is an unimaginably huge bandwidth for the modes that are the most popular (QRSS and friends). Just my humble opinion anyway. 73, Dimitris VK1SV 2011/11/3 Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 5 Whats?, g4gvw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: 5 Whats?, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 8kHz of spectrum, Gary - G4WGT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 5 Whats?, Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |