LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:42:08 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1318849098; bh=XRQXg9qa+wBdC41KfXuIgEt3FTl1/INBDLP4TrHyi88=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=5cWJDwoK/izYLa9RrJtG2z7jQnNsxBjvqnEn18x4xSmJRXNQ0cfXSrDoeCfraYvXfjxpD6ANADaU8LvaDYI+NOsH4FY/6WzJ0xLVtIfhZGxXBX1FzWnaiG45gCnsKgHfLpoGv+YT1PBHPSDw9DDHv+fVF76s1N0/DxREb/BoMwo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=vJ1O2OkeuevCs2+I/D3r4PAQt1K+EeV7LQOnwSe7rSc5QS33yr2nsMyj+KPxp1hrIgNmehS4ztNkN60QGVvxzAQ8luU69GJOa9NPvlddfkHm8jsDKJuBvsPMKjJpDiNgxAMcyoCXPn8bO3Ps9kvxW5sKIjURD9FfMr+TXYw11/g= ;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<CC2FD0DBE12E44C2AEB05695C3452576@White>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Markus I think you are referring to the type of effect that often happens
on 160m. I dont know the answer but I suggest that it might be difficult to
get 136kHz into a duct and get it out again. Localised variations in signal
particularly with the high sensitivity of grabbers is more easily explained
as due to multipath differences between the sites. You can often see the
second site comming in as the first fades out. This may be more prevalent
with you as you may require an extra "hop" to US in the UK on the TA path.
This makes the signal more dependent on any excess attenuation due to
geomagnetic effects as well.

I will seek some advice as to whether it is a feasible mechanism.

Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 1:00 AM
Subject: LF: Ducted TA propagation?


Now just before midnight UT, Ossi's "555" on 136173.1 is clearly visible on
VE2IQ's grabber , and my "NM" on 136172.5 seems to make it through to W4DEX.
However not a trace vice versa...

Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Ducted TA propagation?, Markus Vester Re: LF: Ducted TA propagation?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?, Alan Melia <= Re: LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?, Markus Vester Re: LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?, Alan Melia Re: LF: Ducted TA propagation?, Bill de Carle Re: LF: Ducted TA propagation?, Stefan Schäfer

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: OT - Butane Powered Soldering Iron?, Alan Melia
Next by Date:	Re: LF: LF T/A [137kHz] XNS , XGJ , XES , last night, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Ducted TA propagation?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: Ducted TA propagation?, Markus Vester
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]