To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: low noise and OE5ODL |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:01:13 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1315929640; bh=CPsjXceBfICXdnNHUErl2d3reDgpjRB321r0B7KI8+U=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=kNJxktkbOy3E/aYbkKmuToU1XQ6PrfgxNUIIZjkOwAvpJMVfP1ouanhTrSyn7zQXyJ7XB1jCyEZx2qy25CI3JtjTF+8Rp8Bx3Q6lF9oMvr1slxDgk9bJQ8OZncTgkku9Iqnu20/d58B5eUt6CT1XBvZhyBTlLB1VRvUIOGSHIkU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=CPBVbzpKe7KWfYNJ3GC0NxK5fsr8VXmpjtVWzIxrtrdFaMbcUfpxlRb4tmm3XmfKuaoI6lF10Jv1MeXtzGmK2oA2FB1jZuuDkZLrGa//hunHzWQ9Xq4Ppar4MIgOZyQkdYIcJZUf/UKdaUsSfd7N3+39IgaJ5JGSel51q1mogIg= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan be careful with you appreciation of good conditions using the noise leevel!! The noise usually drops because it is not being propagated so a low noise condition CAN be a state of poor propagation. I think that is the case at the moment. The CME associated with the X-Class flare pushed the Dst down to -60nT and filled the Ring Current region with charge that will leak into the ionosphere over the following days. This increases the night-time absorption and reduces DX signal levels. A demo of this is to look at the levels recorded by Scott VE7TIL for a Russian BC station on 153kHz. This normally strong signal is depressed by 35 to 40dB at present. Alan G3NYK http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk/latest.htm "almost daily" propagation report for LF. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 4:03 PM Subject: LF: low noise and OE5ODL > LF/VLF, > > Very low noise today on LF and VLF. > > Ossi/OE5ODL is QRV again, today on 8970.05 Hz, with the characteristic > drift. A good ID :-) > > Just found some time to build a LF preamp for the ferrite antenna. Maybe > someone has fun and time to make some acty on 137.7 in a hour or so? > Would like to compare signal levels and S/N of both, the 50 Ohm preamp > and the high-Z preamp in a quiet location. > > Screenshots will be posted here... > > Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: Will run a QRSS-3 beacon on 137.730 kHz, using 0 V PA supply voltage > (i.e. no supply). There is a weak signal anyway, just because the FETs > gets switched! This signal is visible at DF6NM in the QRSS-60 window in > 174 km distance! ;-) > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Simple yet reliable method for measuring Q?, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: low noise and OE5ODL, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: low noise and OE5ODL, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: low noise and OE5ODL, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |