Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Ferrite antennas

To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite antennas
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:45:27 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=q6bAzl/W7UUbhXaO+brrUXFAPCIu8mAGXGxdwtVK9wY=; b=On590uuXxhrx23pGqCoZkJLER+XEC8zfnT41QJkKSlZjb5aibrRk3eNyaVRlFPbfib EJvnLVprMvQiFjeG4z+/bAo6Gwrf7zqdNwqV0s+wemD+ja/WqAOfb2+INmfcmzr7n48d XRmFQrD6V2nMqWId8H7IqDwWb2QPdPsw+LVQg=
In-reply-to: <4E6E0AD4.4838.465714@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
References: <4E6E0AD4.4838.465714@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Mike

If the ferrite rod was the drain load what was on the gate?

73s
Roger G3XBM

Via my iPod Touch 4g 2.4GHz handheld. 

On 12 Sep 2011, at 13:36, "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> I have been following the discussion on ferrite receiving antennas - 
> due to work pressures I am a few weeks behind in reading the mail.
> 
> The use of this type of antenna for LF amateur radio is not new. I 
> used it successfully as a portable antenna on the old 73kHz band 
> several years ago. 
> 
> I used the existing winding (LItz) an ordinary long-wave broadcast 
> radio antenna. The rod was about 150mm long. The coil, tuned with a 
> large fixed C and a variable C, formed the drain load of a 2N3819, 
> with the output taken from the source. The selectivity was very high 
> indeed (essential to reduce the huge commercial signal on the 73kHz 
> band) and sensitivity was adequate to overcome the noise level of my 
> very sensitive Datong LF converter.
> 
> The interesting thing was that Peter, G3LDO, tried to replicate this 
> and had poorer results, perhaps indicating that not all long wave 
> radios had ferrite that worked at 73kHz.
> 
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>