Re: LF: My thoughts on ROS

["Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>]

Ok John

Looking  on 502-4  now .. what  power  are you running  ?

Do  you  have  RX ? 

G. 

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John GM4SLV" <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 10:47 AM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: My thoughts on ROS

> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:32:54 +0100
> "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Roger, All
> >
> > ROS HF /MF / Multi access ./ How  did  we  get  here ?
> Graham, LF
>
> Thanks for the informative write up of the history of ROS.
>
> You've obviously delved a lot further into the mode than the rest of us.
>
> For a one-man operation it's a remarkable achievement and I'll keep an
> eye on it's future developement. 
>
> Perhaps I'm being hasty in announcing that I'll not use it again.
>
> Let me know when you're doing more tests with it and I'll see if I can
> persist!
>
> In the meantime I've set up a repeating MFSK-4 mode beacon, using
> "Fldigi" and it's running on 502.4 dial, with AF centre of 1kHz. It's
> full daylight now, so I don't suspect anything will be received.
>
> MFSK-4 uses some of the same techniques as ROS, but I don't know how
> different the performance will be on MF.
>
> Regards,
>
> John