Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: My thoughts on ROS

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: My thoughts on ROS
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 14:25:01 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20110903094755.3b78fb08@svr1>
References: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1109021927550.976@opc1><CAHAQVWO0ux32U1HfVED+RLEwSq0oxGWcz1h-c6j1PFbxV7e5Og@mail.gmail.com><8343E1D319EE4CEFB7C9BD20AAF2BFFA@AGB> <20110903094755.3b78fb08@svr1>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Ok John

Looking  on 502-4  now .. what  power  are you running  ?

Do you have RX ? G.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "John GM4SLV" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 10:47 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: My thoughts on ROS


On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:32:54 +0100
"Graham" <[email protected]> wrote:

Roger, All

ROS HF /MF / Multi access ./ How  did  we  get  here ?

Graham, LF

Thanks for the informative write up of the history of ROS.

You've obviously delved a lot further into the mode than the rest of us.

For a one-man operation it's a remarkable achievement and I'll keep an
eye on it's future developement.
Perhaps I'm being hasty in announcing that I'll not use it again.

Let me know when you're doing more tests with it and I'll see if I can
persist!

In the meantime I've set up a repeating MFSK-4 mode beacon, using
"Fldigi" and it's running on 502.4 dial, with AF centre of 1kHz. It's
full daylight now, so I don't suspect anything will be received.

MFSK-4 uses some of the same techniques as ROS, but I don't know how
different the performance will be on MF.

Regards,

John








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>