Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 136kHz ferrite rod antenna test

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 136kHz ferrite rod antenna test
From: Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:05:17 +0200
In-reply-to: <24DD2264A48C492C89F1A444F5D47A5D@JimPC>
References: <24DD2264A48C492C89F1A444F5D47A5D@JimPC>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Jim,

Good work! If you want we can make a ferrite-ferrite QSO, RX wise ;-)

I also tried a high Z preamp but still didn't get good results. My BF862 has a gain of 26 dB which is to much. I have to try some source resistance (without a parallel C) to optimise things. Maybe there were some VHF oscillations too, not sure. Have to spend more time on this... QRN was very high here as well. Have to wait for better conds here. Maybe tomorrow...
73, Stefan



Am 23.08.2011 19:51, schrieb James Moritz:
Dear LF Group,

Having said quite a lot about ferrite rods on the reflector recently, I thought I better try one as a quick "feasibility study"!
I have a large bar of ferrite I had assembled from surplus "U" cores 
some years ago as part of a portable SAQ receiving system (it's a long 
story...). The"rod" is about 470mm long, with rectangular cross 
section about 30mm x 35mm. This is rather larger than the rods used by 
DK7FC and DF6NM, but the ferrite is more lossy - probably 3C8 or some 
similar "power" grade. 30 turns of litz wire gave L about 360uH and Q 
of 150 (so using litz probably wasn't justified, but I had that length 
to hand). This resonates with about 3700pF at 137kHz, giving an 
equivalent parallel resistance of about 45kohm and a bandwidth a bit 
under 1kHz.
The preamp is a compound JFET/bipolar follower using a J310 biased to 
6mA and a 2N3053 biased to 50mA (probably similar performance to a 
"mini-whip" preamp at 137k). The high Z input is connected directly 
across the tuned antenna winding. With the high QRN on the band this 
evening, it is hard to get a good view of the noise floor, so I used a 
"dummy antenna" consisting of a pot-core inductor wound with the same 
inductance and Q, substituted for the real rod antenna to simulate a 
zero signal and external noise condition. The noise output from the 
resonated dummy antenna was 10dB or more above the RX noise floor 
(SDR-IQ). The preamp with input shorted gave a noise level below the 
RX noise floor. So this preamp arrangement gives sensitivity limited 
by the thermal noise of the antenna, and adequate gain for the 
"reasonably good sensitivity" SDR-IQ (also for my RA1792).
I made a rough estimate of the overall sensitivity of the complete 
system by measuring the level of DCF39, which is a fairly stable 
800uV/m here during daylight. On an arbitrary scale on the SDR-IQ 
spectrogram, DCF39 was -19dB, while the noise floor at around 137.7kHz 
with dummy antenna was -109dB with 0.75Hz FFT noise bandwidth. This 
works out to an antenna noise floor of about 0.03uV/m per sqrt(Hz), 
several dB below quiet 136kHz band conditions. So sensitivity of a 
receive system with this antenna should be limited only by the band 
noise; it should also be possible to reduce the amount of ferrite 
somewhat, especially if lower loss ferrite antenna rods are used. I 
await lower QRN levels for a "live" test !
Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>