Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re[2]: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X and RN3

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X and RN3
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:41:43 +0200
Importance: Normal
References: <CAK59VFMG+gwJRFyzkYd_5p0ai0UokEz2-oQzAw=dTx7WBJFsZA@mail.gmail.com> <81E3EB057A864BED87E8D71A3F1E2CFC@White> <709BC73E7BD6499BA9FC97E456F77BAF@JimPC> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Many thanks to Jim, Minto, Chris, Gerhard, Piotr, Alex for the nice reports on our summertime overnight transmissions!
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
PS only recently I found out that I do not live in JN59NK, but just south of the border, in JN59NJ. The antenna is on sticking out of the rightmost chimney in http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN59NJ69ES
and the coil is in a plastic bag, which is visible as a bright patch on the northernmost roof window. 
 
 

From: Alex K
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 7:39 AM
Subject: LF: Re[2]: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X and RN3

Hello dr Stefan, Markus, LF!
"O" copy here.
(DF6NM is in bottom of screenshots).
I VY GLD to see ur sigs on my grabber, thank you!
Now grabber stopped.
CUAGN on LF es 73!
de rn3aus/Alex


26 августа 2011, 04:37 от "James Moritz" <[email protected]>:
> Dear Stefan, Markus, LF Group,
>
> A screenshot of DK7FC and DF6NM received in IO91VR between 2230 and 0000utc,
> with 84mHz FFT resolution, and using the ferrite rod antenna. DK7FC seems to
> be about 6dB stronger than DF6NM here, on average. But not really a very
> good night for testing receive antennas - the QRN level is so high that the
> proverbial piece of wet string would be just as good!
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>