To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Dutch ham are back on 600m! |
From: | pa3abk <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:15:02 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <83226F06CE0740A195F937DD2BC79DF2@PCvanAlbert> |
References: | <[email protected]> <001101cc3c75$e77dc000$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <83226F06CE0740A195F937DD2BC79DF2@PCvanAlbert> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
Unfortunately I was somewhat too enthousiastic in my publication. Didn't read the fine print which came after the announcement. I'm afraid that Albert is right regarding the extra delay.Somewhere is October is more realistic considering the procedure to be followed. This also goes for the 4M. Jan/pa3abk Op 7-7-2011 9:55, Albert schreef: My understanding of this Dutch publication differs.Freq. range 501 - 505 kHz, entry date somewhere in Oktober (after EU-publication and 3 months standstill in Brussels)73, Albert PA0A -- pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Dutch ham are back on 600m!, M0FMT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Speclab, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Dutch ham are back on 600m!, Albert |
Next by Thread: | Re:LF: Dutch ham are back on 600m!, manginbenoit.pro |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |