Stefan
You were 569 signal on CW 136.8, solid copy here but you need to improve
your RX/Antenna system because you did not hear me running around 1W erp nor
PA0A running 800 Watts
My antenna in use on 137 is the inv L system for both TX/RX up at 100 ft
high
73 de Mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW...
> Jim, Rik, Louis, Albert, Markus, Mal,
>
> Thanks for the QSO (Jim and Markus) or for trying to make a contact in
> CW. I've heared many signals, probably all visible in a 732 mHz window,
> some were audible but not understandable. Still some dBs are missing.
> Unfortunately not really much activity from Germany!
> Maybe it would be easier to get a copy early in the morning...
>
> After many RX tests in the last days i think my RX sensitivity is now
> limited by the band noise, at least in summer. Anyway i will do the test
> and remove the small probe by a C of equal capacity and look for the
> difference of the noise background...
> Using a loop antenna might bring the needed few dBs but means more
> effort and adjusting. Anyway i will do some tests soon.
>
> The PA was running well and the power was limited by the power supply
> :-) I watched to the wave form of the antenna voltage just by hanging
> out a 1:10 oscilloscope probe in about 2m distance to the antenna and
> got 10 Vp, a perfect sine wave of the old and the new PA :-)
>
> Tnx es hpe cuagn next, 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 07.05.2011 16:37, schrieb James Moritz:
> > Dear Stefan, LF Group,
> >
> > Thanks for the DFCW3 / CW QSO - your signal was quite good copy here
> > in spite of fairly noisy conditions - with an extra 10dB as you
> > suggest, it would certainly be armchair copy ;-)
> >
> > Cheers, Jim Moritz
> > 73 de M0BMU
>
|
