Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF?
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:24:56 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=efpgFXvS5NT2+YTYmVwdFDtiQ65zObAMn6bkX/x5eYI=; b=PKJybUaeFIiP+q6/Bx6y87fYaDQ4njlO23Gr9ofBbk+Aj6m7iTC95/T4zE12oaOZjW r5NPd89Vpcx9IxiINGg1Nq+gNTxIT8TEv0oa/8WpoxURiRF15ctVBY5Ir4i2GB5vJMhz p25KgEx2PVPKo9BHz2V90mdptdaC/edP5MsUg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=h3Oq/Eeqo7J+EPUv0WVepXNpUES3xAzyJDdm20bLvt6Hz7rqSQI2uUqCv+f3PwYs4w svngu9ICAsHPG6W27V6RbNjl/dZ3qA/zyD0XcDYLiRGrZ+kfzMhaWXPHFBlZPdeAjRAX 0f9MobNcaEioed4bl75X8orDuF1VtbP4cU5Zo=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Here's an Excel S/S I did in the 73kHz days.   Other people have updated versions now, but it serves to get you into a region to design from - or know when to not bother
 
Andy

 
On 18 March 2011 14:09, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has done the maths to work out what sort of ERP could be expected at 8.97kHz with, say, 100W to a smallish loop antenna in the garden?

It would certainly avoid the need for very very large matching coils and may be easier to engineer than a Marconi. Even an efficiency of -80dB would allow 1uW ERP and, judging by results from G3XIZ with around 2uW, this could be useful with long stable carrier transmissions of several hours. Most of us could run a loop with an area of 100sq m. with thickish wire in our gardens. A loop might also be more practical for portable operations perhaps with a triangle with one high support.

Certainly my own results with WSPR at 136 and 500kHz with just a few watts and quite thin wire and around 80sq m loop area were encouraging. Mind you, 9kHz is very much lower than 136kHz, so the radiation resistance would be tiny I assume.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>