Re: LF: Re: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

Pete

Go into QSO mode on 137.7 and get some reports and do not depend on grabbers. It looks like you are being seen by several observers at least around the UK 

de mal/g3kev

 

----- Original Message -----

From: M0FMT

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:10 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

Hi Gary, Mal and LF

 

Thanks for the info Garry a fine grabber set up and thanks for the report. I have been sliightly side tracked by the reports for which I am grateful.

 

 However my original plan was to test for how much power I can run without messing up this ADSL over copper that BT have cobbled up. Its not a step function because the exchange DSLAMs react slowly dependent upon the level and type of noise they see on the line so my test have to be over time.

 

OK Mal thanks for the info .... I lied...... I do have another xtal on 136.580kc/s I have now QSYed there now...... OK?..... :-)
 

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX

---

From: mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Tue, 1 March, 2011 12:47:50
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

Pete

Its unfortunate u are rock bound. right on the QSO freq. The trouble is you are not visible in EU therefore others in QSO mode are calling CQ on 137.7 unaware that u are there.

The Beacon area seems to be around 136.177 plus/minus

Your signal is solid with me at this distance.

73 gl de mal/g3kev

 

----- Original Message -----

From: M0FMT

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:27 AM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

Hi Dave(34m),Mal(195m) and LF

 

Thanks for the reports. Rig 2W TX RFo/p to ant Inv "L" up abt12m 35lng W-E.

Other reports G4AYT(74m), G6PKS(75m), M0JXM(6m) and G3YXM grabber nw faded(75m) Tnx to all.

 

It is on for short period mainly to test the effect on ADSL Broadband over copper around here.

500kc/s wipes ADSL out with virtually a milliWatt or two but 136 seems OK at this power.

 

Mal it's the only xtal I have but can pull it a few c/s LF. What is the minimum LF you think I should go please? 

 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX

---

From: mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Mon, 28 February, 2011 19:54:24
Subject: LF: Re: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

Not a good idea to Beacon on a busy QSO FREQUENCY.

G3KEV

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave G3WCB.

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 7:06 PM

Subject: LF: RE: 137.7 acty [M0FMT & OH1TN]

Dear All,

 

M0FMT captured sending QRSS 10 on 137,700 yesterday. "O" copy. Pete's signal would have probably been OK in QRSS 3.

 

OH1TN seen in QRSS3 yesterday evening, O>M copy, with QSB.

 

Screenshots attached.

 

73m Dave G3WCB IO91RM, near Windsor, S.E.England.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 28 February 2011 16:51
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: 137.7 acty

Yesterday evening OH1TN was active with a strong and audible signal, not seen for a while. Today FMT is strong also on 137.7.

OH1TN was not visible on the EU Grabbers neither is FMT today.

Strange condx

 

de G3KEV