To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: LF: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band. |
From: | M0FMT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:10:30 +0000 (GMT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1297764630; bh=zrTJo6QgXlGrr42XKlOTGUzyxAfZw8dswj7o9/wd/M4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cLur/3Z2vglsCc7nJyBiof57knmO1b5TjHNVheuK6aPmLItF9Hun0tiMLkuCSKX6PEiC4l4tyo+gfhVLS0AZd4Bx+hQIFcpUlQgY3kZx2qis+Lib3Pb9GjIUPv3vEUz12oHlX85F5QftaRaYvUSaBKRtKQI9q5+E4sTZY18sXps= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cUmpGn7YRdrnW3nK4mIMxoMzejHQ7DDPp0kN3M/z/a7EYq8I5CrN25m4JJeD4gU5yF8sKISGRMA0s2nqQltP5ndQG5iGX2UcAzJtL+gNWH9Jr7FdwV3Ida/xnTMODgfcon3IIWiqVADbic/jE+GjmzTSeOkqgN/ECW5X4f0jC/s=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C88B050FEB0@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <6AD920D46A4546ECB1E0FF76E739307C@AGB> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C88B050FEB0@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Band plans are a bad idea all it does is great unofficial RSGB Policemen that make life a pain like they have done on VHF here in the UK......... Any way the band is only on loan. 73 es GL petefmt
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Taylor <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 15 February, 2011 7:23:06 Subject: LF: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band. Hello Graham,
I would suggest to have all digital modes as close as possible to the band edges, leaving the band centre for CW.
For WSPR there are currently 2 segments: one for EU stations to transmit on (503.9kHz +/- 100Hz) and one NA stations to transmit on (501.1kHz +/- 100Hz) to avoid local QRM (or better said RX overload).
So 503.7kHz +/- 100Hz and/or 501.3kHz +/- 100Hz for other digimodes ?
It would be possible to have a single data segment for EU and NA it we go from frequency division to time division: if all EU stations would transmit in the xx:00-xx:02, xx:04-xx:06, xx:08-xx:10 ... time slots and all NA stations in the xx:02-xx:04, xx:06-xx-08 ... time slots they can use the same frequency without local QRM.
But this would require a minor chang in the WSPR software (and maybe also other software).
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Graham [[email protected]] Verzonden: dinsdag 15 februari 2011 2:20 Aan: [email protected] CC: Joe Taylor Onderwerp: LF: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band. Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band.
The original wspr frequency 502.4 was defined as the working frequency to utilise the ‘clean’ area just under the 504 harmonic, whilst avoiding the various beacons running across the 501/504 band at the time. However, time has moved on and there are now numerous ‘dial setting’s’ in use both sides of the Atlantic.
Due to an apparent increase in the side band noise from the 504 signal , possibly by enhanced propagation , the ROS MF (100 hz b/w) working frequency is to be re defined as 500 USB dial set giving a centre carrier frequency of 501.500
Due to Ae bandwidth and perhaps alignment with other band’s, I would suggest the original WSPR 502.4K is replaced with the lower frequency of 495.9K , thus restoring the System’s coverage and facilitating changes of mode etc within a narrow bandwidth.
I don’t see this detracting from the monitoring of spot frequency beacons over 505Khz , but more appropriate to transmitting stations , which by the nature of the antenna arrays are not able comfortably to qsy from top to bottom of the band without re-tuning, not always a simple option.
Comments or suggestions please ?.
Graham G0NBD
|
Previous by Date: | RE: WOLFie 137.4 kHz, Scholz, Marco |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: HE3OM, HB9ASB |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band., Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: LF: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band., mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |