To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: LF: Re: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band. |
From: | M0FMT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:23:32 +0000 (GMT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1297776213; bh=uMfT2E+141nQpHCfD7uKyaddcnh3+TUH2lBMTQhixiw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZB47FwCNlJyMDXV8lrfc9ZmwN1p+sStS9xb8EV0y2HyncvMY4MZEAvGWIByS7/3Hdar4j3gEIsgUiXt5Yv63HWUcsJQzXKR4PPil+0WTV9gecaXiNNz53HtlauMYbVucNWSWw2oj0rWNbEXQ0ZcPw5XV+W8Q/4XvOptBId7CxYs= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mojgrtgw8lj91TPynG8hmg9Ujpp3gFyGCnanRr4T91z7Kq790NcaT2dFNLETAVOYAt9kDc1buYpBPgQ7TmxLwnlhukG52q9PxCgsfUMOYGNwOVwVNv7U38shOAfQZoU3mfSsnavQXabc9aYO6VX8r+FRZbh0oRqN4A35IzJvcR8=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <002d01cbcd02$77e22890$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <6AD920D46A4546ECB1E0FF76E739307C@AGB> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C88B050FEB0@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <002d01cbcd02$77e22890$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
I operate a low power Beacon on 501.15kc/s so I bag that frequency now. I have already been shooed off 500 at week ends, but to bag the frequencies I guess it needs to stay on 24/7. I also some times operate at the upper band edge so I bag that frequency also. I will be issuing a list of my favourite frequencies to bagsy them as well shortly.
Rik .. EU station have plenty of channels outside the UK 501 / 504 to play on.
This is the RSGB style channelisation of 2/70 in the early 70's all over again. IMHO this band should be like the Wild West no, "no go" areas.
From: mal hamilton <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, 15 February, 2011 11:21:19 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band. This seems a sensible approach. Time division. Keep to the same freq in time slots.
g3kev
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: WOLFie 137.4 kHz, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Re: LF: Re: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band., Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band., mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | RE: Re: LF: Re: RE: Alignment of (Narrow Band) DATA and WSPR frequency’s on the 500 KHz band., Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |