To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:37:12 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OIr7nTF98Jwfo6CEb/qkU4wHGm2mqCnCAHnHNvgU2Vk=; b=wgAxXWAASn8C+r6qyh53EXuExZEntErYY3c5G4ogw+3DdZZP8dxahtjuYV4VwS54xv /IClIXpdcOGM7xAdOjz41+4Wsc93QpJkRDO2ut+HQd/ewL3Y6EQxrkJ4zq4Sdw1PumGc cpXdaHX23aDvDJ/3wgtAdmekkQMxVHS6iXJaU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mVT28H5PMX3MVyOkCWPP+n7Q5xyeoL0Ks6V99gKoeR0RFdSgNtpm4HtRMh/GZ/HP/b akNwqliw0pGlDC0Shym0R3+zPd0YaZnCNN2rhFsxOfmMHy7PEIPmLUtyg/FQlEkWRq+E ymSCmQW5pYQgDaAsMMll7tsrx7pV2wcx2o7aU= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <003501cbab58$13ed4660$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard?
'JNT
On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson <[email protected]> wrote: Not lazy, just an alternative engineering solution, and for some people a more economical one. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: UTC FOR GRABBERS, John Rabson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd, M0FMT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd, John Rabson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd, M0FMT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |