To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:57:03 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=swDmTP1pr9RlIlkR6RoNv/5qBo/hIxZPBaOAj+VpRiI=; b=nb8fQSm7TTgl72wQaukx6R2VvNhj71Aijd5OzVRlCyzru0aMDjYqF+KwpAhF8AZVrA jZOGtn4qDVL+kaVYZqDWN2VlocJTPkzPhsjqFcbbuy0Iob3Sfzas9nWjmwGYmB3WC2YN A2pqBp2MTp2THkRuayuS3vQOYq/RXUqLYsgSU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vRl8izGId8ScqhSYdTD9O9SGzcEHBuSRmZqaq1mn3+fVWnxy62S3okgagoDoyQWkdw Novau65tmV3cDIc2KMdc4gUbHREhQ/yMok5VxSFjYPxmkAJwfFPhFZJ5XbrcWdSWoL3S WKyI534nvs/xGy1n1fhlT0c3yaez6t0qNQnKQ= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <001c01cbad30$5ad3da60$4001a8c0@lark> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <001c01cbad30$5ad3da60$4001a8c0@lark> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
We put it down to an increase in lossy paralle resistance.
In dry conditions, the reactive (out of phase) near field current terminates on ground radials without passing through too much (relatively speaking) lossy ground material.
When everything is covered in water, the reactive field is conducted away into lossy ground material before entering the radials. Being resistive, the current moves into phase with the E-field and ,starts to introduce added I^2R loss. Most significantly here, walls and roof tiles the top-hat passes close to become more conductive, extracting noticably in-phase currents from the E field.
The result is a decreased resistance in parallel with the antenna capacitance, and when you plug decreased parallel R into the equation for parallel-to-serial transform, voila, an increased series term.
The tuning shifts marginally, but it was far worse when the effect was first discovered on 73kHz.
Was that really well over a decade ago - time flies!
Andy
On 5 January 2011 23:28, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote: Yes that is what my aerial measurements said as well in rain....increased |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 500KHz Grabber and WSPR RX off-line, Mark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 500kHz Classe-E, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Alan Melia |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |